Comparative Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training and Whole-Body Vibration on Balance and Gait in Subacute Stroke Patients
PBBT vs. WBV in Subacute Stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55279/jafmdc.v7i2.415Keywords:
Balance, Berg Balance Scale, Falls, Gait, Perturbation-based Balance Training, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Whole Body Vibration.Abstract
Objective: To explore the comparative effects of perturbation-based balance training (PBBT) and whole-body vibration (WBV) on balance and gait in patients during the subacute phase of stroke.
Methodology: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at DHQ Hospital, Sialkot and included twenty-eight participants with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke who were between 12–20 weeks post stroke, aged 40–60 years, able to stand independently, walk 2 meters, and score >20/56 on Berg Balance Scale. The participants were selected through a non-probability convenience sampling technique. The study was carried out over a ten-month period, from April 2022 to January 2023, following ethical approval. Subjects were randomly allocated into two groups using computer-generated numbers (n=14 each). Group 1 received balance-oriented training with unidentified perturbations combined with conventional physical therapy, while Group 2 received whole-body vibration therapy with conventional physical therapy. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) were used as outcome measures, assessed at baseline and after six weeks of intervention. The independent t-test and paired t-test were used to identify differences within and between groups, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
Results: Significant differences were detected in the scores of the BBS and DGI between the two groups. The within-group analyses for both Group 1 and Group 2 indicated significant improvements, with more marked improvements in the perturbation-based balance training (PBBT) group. Baseline comparison of BBS and DGI showed mean differences of 0.83 and 0.50, respectively, with p > 0.05, indicating similarity at baseline. Post-intervention comparison for the BBS showed a mean score of 31.91±3.87 in the PBBT group and 26.58±3.98 in the WBV group. For the DGI, the mean score was 14.66±1.61 in the PBBT group and 12.41±1.92 in the WBV group.
Conclusion: The study concluded that while both interventions resulted in significant improvements in balance and gait, PBBT led to greater improvements than WBV.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rida Aziz, Dr Sana Riaz, Sameena Pari, Areeba Aziz, Nirmal Javed, Laraib Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
Non Commercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.










